Author: Rabbi David Krishef
A Comment on How Difficult it is to FIGURE THINGS OUT
In the field of Jewish ethics, Reb Simha Bunum suggests a way for the human being to balance humility and self worth:
“Rabbi Bunum said to his disciples: “Everyone must have two pockets, so he can reach into the one or the other, according to his needs. In his right pocket are to the words:’For my sake was the world created,’ and in his left:’ I am earth and ashes.”
Anochi Afar va-efer (from Gen. 18:27)
and
Bishvili nivra ha-olam (from Sanhedrin 37a)
[from Volume 2 of Buber’s Tales of the Hasidim, p. 249]
The comic strip “Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal,” by Zach Weiner has a slightly more complicated take on the same basic idea:
What do you learn from a Holocaust Museum?
I brought a group of college students to the Holocaust Memorial Center in Farmington Hills Michigan today. The experience of visiting Holocaust museums always leaves me uneasy. While walking through the exhibit and listening to the docent, I am constantly asking myself, ‘What is the intended outcome of such a visit? What impression is it meant to give the visitors?’
The tour began with a nod towards the Armenian holocaust, with a look at a special exhibit by an Armenian artist. The implied message is, ‘See, Jews are not unique. It happened before, and no one noticed. There has always been tremendous evil in the world, and unless we recognize the signs and take action, it will happen again we will be guilty of complicity.’ At the same time, however, we wonder why, if Jews are not unique, there are no museums of the Armenian Christian Holocaust? Why don’t they remember and shout out warnings to the world, as we do?
The tour guide made the point over and over again that Jews are not unique. ‘Who is the Jew,’ he asked. ‘Every and any one of you,’ he answered. The average citizen who knew what was happening and let it happen made the Holocaust possible. You have to believe that it can and will happen again. You have to believe that you might be among the next set of victims, unless you understand how to watch for the signs and how to take action.
Then we approach the introduction to the permanent exhibit, pausing at a list of Jewish Nobel prize winners. A sign points out that Jew make up less the one percent of the population, but comprise 25 percent of the Nobel prize recipients. We are asked to imagine what the world destroyed when 40 percent of world Jewry was wiped out. We are invited to imagine how much better the world would have been if the brilliant potential of European Jewry had been allowed to flower.
I wonder what my students took away from the experience. I wonder what the two predominantly (or completely) non-Jewish grade school groups who were also visiting today took away from their experience. Did they absorb the message that Jews are better and smarter than other people, and therefore our tragedy is monumentally worse than the Armenian Holocaust? Or did they absorb the message that the same philosophy that gives birth to Jew hatred also spawns hatred of people of color, people with disabilities, and/or people of any minority religion?
The exhibit seems to want it both ways. On one hand, Jews are just like anyone else, and the next victim could be you. Other other hand, Jews are a unique treasure.
We realize that Jews have ritualized memory and the importance of remembering things, good and bad, to a depth possibly unmatched by other ethnic or religious groups. Deep down, however, I think there is deep Jewish ambivalence about what to do with the Holocaust memory. We have been trained by Passover and Purim and Yom Kippur to reenact our most important memories in order never to forget them. On the other hand, we recognize that the Holocaust was an intensely painful and deeply dysfunctional period of our history, and we understand that unlike our other historical memories, this one does not have a positive lesson unless we can convince other people to join with us in taking responsibility for the evil and guarding the world so it will never happen again.
Students — Tell me: How do you understand the experience you saw and heard today?
On the Death of An Enemy
What do you do and say when your enemy falls?
Do you follow the advice of Proverbs 24:17, ” If your enemy falls, do not exult; If he trips, let your heart not rejoice?”
Or do you follow the advice of Proverbs 11:10, ” When the wicked perish there are shouts of joy.”
Do you follow the practice of the Pesah seder and spill drops of wine and tears over the loss of life?
Or do you sigh with relief that a man dedicated to evil and death has been eliminated from our world?
Do you bless God, the righteous judge?
Do you bless God who breaks the enemy and humbles the arrogant?
Did you rejoice, or would you have rejoiced on this day 66 years ago when Hitler’s death was announced?
Did you take a breath in wonder at the coincidence of Osama Bin Laden’s death on that anniversary, on the oh-so-grim day that we remember the Shoah?
Along with that sign of relief and that grateful breath, let me just say that I am grateful to our President and our armed forces for their persistence. May it be understood as a message to Islamic fascists that attacks against our country will not go unpunished.
Divre Harav/Words from the Rabbi – May/2011
Conservative Judaism has been in the news in the past couple of months, but it hasn’t been entirely good news. The United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism has approved a new strategic plan intended to revive the “brand.” The Rabbinical Assembly devoted a number of sessions at their recent convention to such titles as, “Thriving Against Difficult Odds,” and “Creating a Culture of Success.” The overall picture being presented is one of a aging and dying movement trying to redefine itself.
It’s not that I believe that we shouldn’t be self-critical. On the contrary, as individuals, as an institution and as a movement, we only learn and grow by honest evaluation and mindful change. I am concerned not about the criticism but about the sense of panic surrounding the critical questions. Hysteria does not lead to useful deliberation and decision making. Panic leads to adopting program because they are successful for someone else, not because they advance our particular mission and vision. Hysteria leads to widespread cutting of programs and budget in order to balance the budget based on saving money, not based on focused attention to our raison d’être.
We need to have and express a sense of passion about our mission. If we are not sufficiently devoted the community that our synagogue has built, we will not be fully capable of making informed decisions about what is ikar and what is tafel, what is central and what is peripheral.
One of my colleagues was quoted in an article about the challenges facing the conservative movement, saying that his 1500 seat Sanctuary for his 700 household congregation averaged 100 people on a Shabbat morning. He has an enormous building built on a grand scale for a 1200-1500 household congregation sitting virtually empty during the week.
Fortunately, due to the wisdom of our board and a measure of good luck, we are not faced with such grave immediate questions. We have been able to rent out our building so that it is generating income during the times that it would have been sitting empty. Nevertheless, it is the responsibility of the Board and the Congregation to continue looking at a range of possibilities for what our congregation might be in the future. How might we encourage more people to affiliate? What if our membership increases – what more might we do with the additional income and people? Why do people leave the congregation (other than for the obvious reasons of death and moving out of town)? What will happen if our membership decreases? What will happen if one of our renters leaves? What will we do to replenish our building fund balance if large scale expenses, such as replacing a roof, deplete the fund?
I believe in Congregation Ahavas Israel and am committed to being a part of its long term success. I don’t share the sense of panic regarding the greying and shrinking of the Conservative movement. I believe if we stick to our core mission, of creating a vibrant egalitarian Conservative Jewish community by helping each individual follow his/her spiritual path using traditional Jewish practice; that we can address any situation that arises calmly and sensibly by remembering that we are a community which embodies Torah, making every decision and every act reflect our commitment to Torah.
